Why Today’s Blockchains Won’t Survive the Next Decade

25.09.2025

The first generation of blockchains accomplished something extraordinary.

Bitcoin gave us digital scarcity. Ethereum unlocked programmable money. Solana  demonstrated high-speed networks were possible. Each chain carved out its own value proposition within the broader ecosystem. These achievements laid the foundation for an industry worth trillions of dollars and proved that decentralized coordination at scale was possible.

But they were designed for a different era. Bitcoin was built to prove that peer-to-peer currency could exist. Ethereum’s goal was to show that smart contracts were viable. Neither was built with billions of daily users in mind. As adoption accelerates, the blockchain technology market is projected to reach $1.4 trillion by 2030, the central challenge is how quickly these systems can evolve without years of costly R&D and the trade-offs of redesigning their foundations.

That is where modular infrastructure changes the economics of progress.

The Cost of Scaling Blockchains

Scaling or upgrading a chain is complex and resource-intensive. Throughput ceilings remain stark: Bitcoin processes around seven transactions per second, Ethereum roughly fifteen, while traditional payment systems such as Visa operate at over 24,000. When demand spikes, fees surge because congestion is the only mechanism available for rationing scarce blockspace.

Monolithic design compounds this problem. By binding execution, consensus, settlement, and data availability together, every improvement becomes harder to implement and riskier to deploy. Hard forks can fracture communities, and incremental changes are often constrained by the weakest component of the system.

Monolithic Issues Real-World Impact
Resource Competition High fees during peak usage
Limited Customization One-size-fits-none infrastructure
Upgrade Complexity Hard forks risk network splits
Performance Ceilings Cannot scale beyond architectural limits

Fragmented User Experience 

User experience has not kept pace either. Setting up wallets, navigating approvals, and paying multiple layers of fees make onboarding arduous. In practice, interacting with blockchain applications remains far more complicated than the seamless sign-ups and embedded payments consumers expect from Web2 platforms.

Ask someone not accustomed to using decentralized financial products to make a trade on a DeFi protocol and watch what happens. The current UX isn’t great: 

  • Install a browser extension wallet
  • Buy ETH on an centralized exchange (if your jurisdiction allows it)
  • Transfer it to your hot wallet (paying gas)
  • Approve token spending (paying gas)
  • Execute your transaction (paying more gas)
  • Hope the network isn't congested
  • Pray you didn't mess up a contract address

We've made using blockchain harder than filing taxes.

Security and Resilience Gaps

Resilience adds another layer of cost. Solana, despite impressive throughput, has endured multiple network outages; BSC continues to face concerns around centralization; and Ethereum itself has required emergency consensus patches. These incidents highlight the difficulty of pushing monolithic systems beyond their design limits, and the reality that performance often comes at the expense of reliability. Each fix absorbs capital and engineering talent that could otherwise be directed toward ecosystem growth.

Why Modularity Matters

The industry is now moving toward modular design, in which execution, consensus, settlement, and data availability operate as distinct layers. This separation reduces costs, accelerates iteration, and allows each component to optimize for its particular function rather than being constrained by the system as a whole.

The benefits are significant. Upgrades can be deployed without risking entire networks. Workloads scale horizontally across layers rather than bottlenecking in a single place. Chains gain the flexibility to specialize, whether in consumer payments, institutional settlement, or high-frequency trading. And critically, development teams can devote their resources to ecosystem growth and application design instead of years of rebuilding the database layer.

This is the same progression software engineering made when it moved away from monolithic programs toward microservices, APIs, and distributed architectures. The lesson was that modularity increases both efficiency and resilience, and blockchain infrastructure is now undergoing the same transition.

The Altius Approach

At Altius Labs we focus on the execution layer, because this is where performance bottlenecks emerge most acutely and where the leverage for improvement is highest. Our parallel, memory-first architecture processes thousands of transactions concurrently while maintaining consistency, delivering enterprise-grade throughput that plugs into existing blockchains without the need for disruptive rewrites. 

For ecosystems, this means scaling without multi-year migrations; for new chains, it means launching with production-grade capabilities from the start.

This work sits deep in the stack, often invisible to end users, and that is precisely the point. Chains should be free to spend their resources on what makes them unique, whether that is developer communities, ecosystem growth, or applications; without being forced to spend years reinventing their core infrastructure.

We believe in a multi-chain future in which different blockchains specialize in different roles, but all benefit from infrastructure that lowers the cost and accelerates the path to scale. The pie is only going to grow larger, and modular architecture is the foundation that ensures every participant can take part in that expansion.

Implications for Builders and Investors

For builders, the lesson is clear: select infrastructure that evolves with you rather than locking into brittle designs that impose long-term constraints. 

For investors, the opportunity lies less in chasing the next Layer 1 narrative and more in backing the infrastructure projects that reduce the cost of scale and enable adoption across many ecosystems.

Conclusion

Blockchains are in a race to mature into the roles where they can deliver the most value. Modular infrastructure offers the foundation for that transition, allowing chains to upgrade invisibly, serve billions of users, and grow the industry’s share of the global economy.

The next decade will belong to systems that make blockchain as reliable, scalable, and unobtrusive as the internet itself.

📄 Want to learn more?
Read our Docs
Follow us
Follow us
Follow us on X for updates, announcements, and sneak peeks!
The future of blockchain is parallel, modular, and connected. Let’s build it together.